The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

VERSION 1

Many argue that an increase in fuel prices could help reduce the amount of harmful emissions that contribute to environmental issues. While this may be true to some extent, I believe that a global awareness campaign is a more feasible and effective option.

On one hand, an increase in fuel prices may encourage individuals to reduce the distance and frequency of private vehicle usage, leading to a decrease in harmful emissions. People may also opt for more cost-effective and environmentally friendly means of transportation, such as public transport or electric bikes. However, this policy only addresses a portion of the complex environmental issues. Pollution is caused by a range of factors, including the use of plastic bags, chemicals in agriculture and industry, and other practices that contaminate both water and land.

Therefore, a more effective solution would be to launch a worldwide campaign that raises consumer awareness about the environmental costs of their shopping habits and encourages companies to reduce their consumption of noxious chemicals and adopt greener cultivation and manufacturing methods. This approach would address the root causes of environmental problems and promote sustainable practices on a larger scale.

In conclusion, while increasing fuel costs may help to some extent, the most effective solution to environmental problems is to increase public and corporate awareness of these issues and promote sustainable practices that reduce harmful emissions and protect the planet. By taking resolute actions, we can reverse the effects of climate change and preserve the environment for future generations.

VERSION 2

While many believe that raising the price of petrol is a solution to environmental problems, I argue that other measures may have an even greater impact.

While increasing taxes on petrol may limit the number and length of journeys made by motorists, governments could also invest in public transport infrastructure to provide alternative means of transportation. This would encourage more people to use public transport, reducing emissions from private vehicles and helping to combat the greenhouse effect. Additionally, policies such as congestion charges and free bus and train passes can be effective in reducing pollution from private vehicles and improving air quality, as shown in London.

However, while a rise in fuel prices may be a useful short-term measure, it is important to adopt transport policies that are effective in the long term. By reducing the reliance on private vehicles and investing in sustainable alternatives, we can mitigate the environmental impact of transportation and combat global warming.

In conclusion, while raising petrol prices may be a useful environmentally-friendly transport measure, it is important to consider other steps that can be more effective in the long term, such as investing in public transport infrastructure and implementing policies that reduce the use of private vehicles. By taking these measures, we can work towards a more sustainable future and protect the environment for generations to come.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/ieltswritingplus

The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?